Australian genomics, weird animals and sex (42624)
Australian genomics got off to rather a slow start as some of our biochemists predicted that this DNA stuff was just a passing fad. Julian Wells was a star exception, a biochemist who got that molecular biology was the start of a new kind of biochemistry. How right he was! He was one of the instigators of the genome meetings, tiny gatherings of young scientists initially held in Adelaide and Eden. The reason they moved to Lorne was that Dave Kemp called me up in a panic late in the year for ideas on where to hold the next genomics meeting. It happened that I had just chatted to protein biochemist friends who had raved about Erskine House as a venue. I recall that at the first Lorne meeting I talked about my discovery that inhibiting DNA methylation reactivates genes on the inactive mouse X chromosome. And here we are at Erskine House today, with fantastic new tools to explore epigenetics.
Australia made a rather late debut into the big genome business, but genomes of our unique animals are proving a goldmine of information. This is because Australia has been cut off from other continents for a long time, so the genes and regulatory systems of our animals have had time to evolve differently. These genome differences can provide insights for all sorts of studies. Our work has been on sex, and here, Australian animals – kangaroos, platypus and dragon lizards – have delivered stunning insights into what chromosomes and genes determine sex, how they work and how they evolved. This work also illustrates how crucial good cytogenetics is for interpretating sequence data. I look forward to the bridging of the scale gap between sequence and cytology, DNA and chromosomes, which will come with long read sequencing, chromosome-scale assemblies and new cytogenetic techniques to explore the genome in 3D, which must underpin the epigenetic control of gene action.